I CAN'T STAND IT!!!

THE EXTREME COURT HAS DONE IT AGAIN!!! How is it possible that 5 Supreme Court justices can COMPLETELY MISINTERPRET the 5th Amendment of the Constitution to allow cities to simply take private property TO SELL IT TO PRIVATE BUSINESSES FOR PRIVATE USE!!! THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO SUCH AUTHORITY GRANTED TO IT!!! I AM INCENSED!!!

The 5th Amendment to the Constitution reads in part: "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." OK, that means that the government CAN take property under two distinct conditions: it must be for public use, and there must be just conpensation given to the property owner. This seems reasonable enough, if the public needs a road built or some other such thing that everyone will use to their benefit, the government should, under certain circumstances, be able to take such property while paying the owner the current value of whatever the property is. In the case linked above, homeowners were fighting a builder who wanted to put up an OFFICE COMPLEX for their own private use. The city argued that they need the tax revenue from the office building, so that was their entire justification for the case.

Now, let's think about what the impact of this ruling is: Under this ruling, if your home, church, whatever, stand in the way of a developer who wants to put in a shopping mall on your corner, the city can come in and TAKE YOUR PROPERTY!!! THIS IS A COMPLETE REVERSAL OF THE PURPOSE OF THE 5TH AMENDMENT, AND IS A SLAP IN THE FACE TO ALL WHO CHERISH LIBERTY!! Am I the only one who sees this? The Extreme Court has just effectively eliminated the right to private property. The (communist, in my opinion) justice Paul Stevens wrote "The city has carefully formulated an economic development that it believes will provide appreciable benefits to the community, including _ but by no means limited to _ new jobs and increased tax revenue,"---WHAT??? So for the benefit of adding tax revenue the city can therefore simply take over someone's private property??? WHAT ARE WE BECOMING??? He was joined in his perverted interpretation by the other communists on the court, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsberg and Breyer.

It is painfully obvious to me that the purpose of this REVISION of our Constitution is to promote the paternal government, more commonly known as Communism and his little brother Socialism. It's completely obvious that those in power want complete control, and this just another stepping stone to accomplish it. If people don't own their property, if it is simply gifted to them by the government and can be taken at any time, then the people must be dependent upon the government for everything. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!

I don't know if it's possible, and I don't read anything about it in the Constitution, but we need to have some way of impeaching these radical judges that fail to interpret laws strictly from our Constitution. If we need to amend the Constitution to do so, then so be it. We also need to be able to impeach these justices that obviously can't read and iterpret simple english--things such as "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed", and "nor shall private property be taken for publice use without just compensation".

This is a complete and utter outrage, and we need people to start voicing their opinions LOUDLY.